Many people are changing Apple original batteries, then which manufacturers are produced by the original battery?

Some people say that Huawei mobile phone has no technical content, because Huawei mobile phone parts are purchased, so Huawei mobile phone is an assembled mobile phone. If this logic is followed, Apple phones are also assembled because the parts of Apple phones are also purchased.

If you look at Huawei and Apple this, then this is a bit shallow. As we all know, Apple and Huawei have their own mobile phone chips, but these two mobile phone manufacturers have no production capacity, as long as designing the ability of chips. Even so, no one will think that the A series of chips, the unicorn chip is not apple, Huawei.

Through the class ratio of the chip, we can draw a conclusion, that is: Apple’s original battery is Apple, not a vendor’s proposal. In other words, Apple’s battery and chip are the same, Apple is responsible for designing, battery manufacturers are responsible for substitute, and produced batteries are collectively referred to as ‘Apple Battery’. So what kind of battery manufacturers gave Apple’s workshop?

The A series of chips are unified by Apple, because of the capacity, Apple will find Taiwan Power, Samsung Operation. The A-series chips produced by these two companies can be used normally, and unified standards.

Like A Series chips, Apple has also developed Apple batteries, unified implementation of GB / T 18287-2000 standard. Therefore, the battery produced by Apple’s foundry is not essential, and it can be considered an Apple battery.

I have to say that Apple has mastered the core technology, through the battery design, putting the commercial use of the battery in hand. The battery is not difficult, and many people can be found worldwide. Because of this, Apple’s battery has become a business order that many battery manufacturers strive to be afraid, and this is the bottom gas of Apple’s heavy mobile phone market.

Apple mobile phone shipments have a vision, and 2 in 2021 will not be a problem. Even in 5 years ago, Apple’s ship’s shipments have exceeded 100 million sets. As the average unit price, the company’s largest mobile phone manufacturers, Apple’s partial profits are also the most expensive. Because of this, there are many battery manufacturers who are willing to produce batteries for Apple. Early, Sony, Samsung, Le Jinhua, Dongguan New Energy is Apple Mobile Optional Battery.

First, Sony is the masterpiece of the manufacturing industry, and the Sony mobile phone is also the existence of Sony mobile phone in the mobile phone market. However, Sony has strong strength in parts processing, cameras, sensors, and precision machining, so Sony is also a generous thing to give Apple mobile phone.

Second, the strength of Samsung Electronics does not have to be said, the only company in the world can produce mobile phones independently. From chips, motherboards, screens, sensors, cameras, batteries, etc., Samsung Electronics can be produced. Therefore, Samsung gives the Apple mobile phone, which is an extremely easy thing.

Third, in 2003, LG invested in China in my country. This company is engaged in the production and development and production of batteries, and the production of cutting-edge electronic materials. LG has far-reaching influence in the world, and Lejin chemistry can produce batteries to Apple mobile phones. This is also a more easy thing.

Fourth, Dongguan New Energy is a company dedicated to battery cells, packages, and system integration. In the field of battery, Dongguan’s new energy has great influence.

It is not difficult to see that these four companies are leaders in the battery. In particular, Lejin Chemistry and New Energy in Dongguan. These two companies are professional research and development, manufacturers who produce batteries. The so-called: Sheriff has a success, the operation is specialized, and it is justified in these two companies.

With the increase in the shipments of Apple mobile phones, Apple’s battery generations have become more and more, such as Shunda, New World, Germany, and Xinwangda and other manufacturers have successively become Apple mobile phone.

However, these manufacturers and Samsung, Sony, and Lejin chemistry have essential differences, because these three companies can produce battery cells independently, while Shunda, Germany, Xinwangda, etc. can only purchase battery, packaged, package Can produce an Apple mobile phone battery.

Through a series of competition, the batteries produced by Germany and Xinwangda are more in line with the needs of Apple. Since then, Apple mobile phone batteries are mainly produced by these two companies.

First, Desai Battery was established in 1983. After more than 30 years of development, Desai batteries have become a battery that sets a lithium battery, zinc air battery, lithium polymer battery, fuel cell, and other kinds of batteries, battery materials. supplier. It is not exaggerated, and the battery that can be seen on the market can be produced and can be completed independently.

Second, Xinwangda was established in 1997 and is a leading lithium-ion battery module solution and product provider. Although Xinwang’s business has no extensive business, Xinwangda focuses on a horse in a lithium-ion battery, is a strong battery supplier in China, and a global battery.

Whether it is Lejin Chemistry, Dongguan New Energy, or Germany, Xinwang, facing Apple, they can’t be alone. Why is this so? Because Apple is not afraid of them, these battery manufacturers rely on Apple’s orders.

It can be seen that only master core competitiveness and core productivity can be able to overport. What is the core competitiveness? Such as Taiwan Power, Samsung’s chip solution strength, only these two mobile phone chips can be produced worldwide. What is the core productivity? A large-scale enterprise such as Apple can design the battery module to give this design to any battery manufacturer can workene.

So TSMC, Samsung is a company that masters core competitiveness. Strong Apple does not dare to despise them. Work hard, domestic electronics manufacturers, the road you have to go is still far away.

120W fast charge, Snapdragon 888, 12 + 256GB, Vivo flagship has dropped 1300, serving the new machine

2021 has been close to the end, in December, there will be the first listing of the new Snapdragon 8GX Gen1, Tianzhu 9000 chip smartphone, and after each mobile phone brand will release the new flagship, the old flagship has also reached the way.

Snapdragon 888 has been never honest this year because of fever this year, and the flagship mobile phone equipped with the Snapdragon 888 is also dragged down, sales is general, the price is diving. Even for this flagship, there are many advantages, such as Vivo flagship iqoo 7.

IQOO 7 is not much, compared to iQOO NEO5 gap, iQOO 7 is significantly higher, and now the price is more close to iQOO NEO5.12 + 256GB configuration, pricing 4198, now drop to 2899, 1. IQOO NEO5, priced 2999, is now reduced to 2399. The price gap between the two phones, from the initial 1200, turned today 500.

The configuration advantage of iQOO 7 is very big. First, the Snapdragon 888 is not easy to use, but the cost is higher than the Snapdragon 870. Second, the screen of Iqoo 7 is much better, 120Hz refresh rate supports intelligent variation, and has a 1000 Hz touch sampling rate. Then, iQOO 7 has 120W fast charge, 15 minutes can be full.

Furthermore, iQOO 7 camera is stronger, Sony IMX598 main photo, plus two 13 million pixels, there is telephoto, super wide angle, no sign. In addition, IQOO 7 also has independent HIFI chips, VIVO flagship tradition "art" has not been lost.

Considering the perspective of hardware parameters, iQOO 7 has a high cost. However, the actual experience of the Snapdragon 888 is not as good as the Snapdragon 870, and it is close to the new Snapdragon 8GX Gen1 conference. Whether it is worth it. If the Snapdragon 8GX Gen1 is still "Fire Dragon", then it is not lost (manual dog head).

US judge ruling: Google must hand over documents related to the secret anti-craftsmanship

According to the GizModo website, report on December 1,A judge of the US National Labor Review Committee ordered Google, must hand over a series of documents related to a secret anti-craftsmanship in 2019. Since December 2020, this science and technology giant has been in legal disputes. At that time, the US Department of Labor accused Google’s illegal monitoring and retaliation of two workers who participated in the ILO. According to the 1935 National Labor Relations Law, such behavior was It is considered "protected activities". The US Ministry of Labor Review Committee has subsequently expanded to include the other three former employees, although Google has reached a reconciliation.

Image from: Google

These documents involve the strategy of cooperating with Google and IRI consultants. IRI Consulting Company is a "labor relationship" company, Google hires it to assist Google to reduce organizational activities within the company. Google has tried to hide these documents, claiming that these documents represent an officials assigned by the "Legal Confidential Communications" Tribunal, and found only 9 in 80 documents can be properly classified as privileged documents.

According to reports, these documents are not open to the public, but now they will now be handed over to the National Labor Review Committee, including "preparing for campaigns to employees, how employees carry out training materials against union movements in their management, Trade Union Information Transfer and Information Zoom Suggestions "and other materials.

Google has also reported that the company like IRI Consulting is known as a part of the company’s comprehensive file as part of its contract work, including a large amount of privacy, such as personality and emotional analysis. It is well known that companies like Amazon and Tesra have also adopted similar radical strategies.